Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Print this page
Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published
by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action
from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived
document may not work.
|
Africa: Landmines Campaigns Letter
Africa: Landmines Campaigns Letter
Date distributed (ymd): 980323
Document reposted by APIC
+++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++
Region: Continent-Wide
Issue Areas: +economy/development+ +security/peace+ +US policy focus+
Summary Contents:
This posting contains a letter from the African Campaigns to Ban Landmines
to President Clinton, on the occasion of his visit to six African countries,
calling for the U.S. to sign the treaty to ban landmines and take other
actions. The campaigns ask for additional endorsements for their demands,
particularly from African non-governmental organizations. Endorsements
should be sent to the South African Campaign to Ban Landmines (rsherman@gem.org.za).
For additional information on landmines and Africa see: http://www.africapolicy.org/action/lmine.htm
+++++++++++++++++end profile++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
19 March 1998
Dear friends
Greetings from the South African Campaign to Ban Landmines
Re: President Clinton's visit to Senegal, Rwanda, Ghana, Botswana, Uganda,
and South Africa. During the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)
meeting in Frankfurt (February 1998), the African Campaigns met and discussed
forthcoming actions for President Clinton's visit to Africa.
What are the issues for the African Campaigns?
" It is ironic that President Clinton will come to Africa to discuss
economic recovery support when one of the most critical factors impeding
economic recovery in Africa are the millions of acres of land that cannot
be developed as a result of landmines."
Africa is a continent that is solidly behind the Convention on the Prohibition
of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines
and on their Destruction. In fact thirty-eight African nations have signed
the Treaty - including all those in the Southern African Development Community.
Thus far the Clinton Administration has refused to sign.
All six countries Clinton will visit have played significant roles in
the international collaborative efforts to create a mine-free world. In
May 1997, member states of The Organisation of African Unity (OAU) met
in Johannesburg for the First International Conference for African Experts
on Landmines. Representatives from governments and non-governmental organisations
agreed to adopt as a common goal the elimination of all anti-personnel
landmines in Africa and the establishment of Africa as an anti-personnel
landmine free zone.
Take action against US landmines policy!
The following pages consists of the statement prepared by the African
Campaigns to Ban Landmines, which is being released today for endorsements
and for galvanizing the support of international civil society to the problems
of AP mines on our continent.
For the next 10 days while Clinton travels through Africa we will be
collecting endorsements protesting against US policy. The African Campaigns
will be calling on the Clinton Administration amongst other steps, to take
the following immediate actions:
- Make a commitment, effective immediately, never to use or to be party
to the use, by governments or opposition groups, of anti-personnel mines
in Africa.
- Sign and Ratify the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling,
Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines and on their Destruction.
- The United States must recognise its moral responsibility as a source
of the landmines which blight the African continent and should release
separate funds for the assistance of mine victims, their families and mine-affected
communities.
Please support the African campaigns in their efforts to pressurise
the Clinton Administration to sign and ratify the Landmine Ban treaty and
provide mine action and victim assistance. Endorse this statement which
will be sent to all the US embassies in Africa and support African efforts
to become a mine free zone.
Please send organisational or individual endorsements to:
Richard Sherman
South African Campaigns to Ban Landmines
Tel: + 27 11 403 7666 Fax: + 27 11 403 7563
Email: rsherman@gem.org.za
Endorsements will be collected up until the 2 of April 1998.
A Luta Continua!
Richard Sherman
A call to the United States Government from the African Campaigns
to Ban Landmines:
"Mr. Clinton! You are entering a mine free zone!"
" Our country has a bitter experience with mines and their impact.
In every corner of our land these treacherous explosive devices have left
their countless evil trails and marks on the families and lives of our
citizens. The nearly thirty years of destablising war waged against the
Mozambican people brought along the ghosts of death, maiming and scars,
which were inflicted on all this nation's inhabitants regardless of age,
sex, skin colour or social function."
-- President Chissano of Mozambique,
Speaking at the Fourth International NGO Conference on Landmines
"Towards a landmine-free Southern Africa"
Maputo 1997.
Background
The presence of anti-personnel landmines (AP mines) in our continent
has created and continues to create a humanitarian crisis of massive proportions.
Anti-personnel landmines pose a major obstacle for sustainable community
development and agricultural activity. Problems of reconstruction and development,
foreign debt and poverty are exacerbated by the presence of these deadly
weapons in our soil.
In Africa, the legacy of war and in particular anti-personnel landmines
continue to burden the most vulnerable sectors of our societies, amongst
them women and children. African people continue to experience first hand
the effects and tragedy wrought on civilian populations by the indiscriminate
use of anti-personnel landmines.
The international community now accepts that mines are no longer a security
issue, but a humanitarian crisis of global proportions and have thus united
to negotiate a treaty banning these weapons. Besides for countries such
as the U.S.A, China, Russia, Pakistan and India, the world has largely
been unanimous in its condemnation and revulsion of war and anti-personnel
landmines, which have targeted civilian populations.
Africa is a continent that is solidly behind the Convention on the Prohibition
of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines
and on their Destruction. In fact thirty-eight African nations have signed
the Treaty - including all those in the Southern African Development Community.
Thus far the Clinton Administration has refused to sign.
As part of President Clinton's official agenda when he travels to several
Africa states this month are discussions around the Africa Growth and Opportunity
Act and an African Peacekeeping Force. It is ironic that President Clinton
will come to Africa to discuss economic recovery support when one of the
most critical factors impeding economic recovery in Africa are the millions
of acres of land that cannot be developed as a result of landmines. President
Clinton, whose visit to Africa is the first by an American President in
20 years, will visit six countries who have positively responded to the
humanitarian crisis of landmines. All have played significant roles in
the international collaborative efforts to create a mine-free world. In
May 1997, member states of The Organisation of African Unity (OAU) met
in Johannesburg for the First International Conference for African Experts
on Landmines.
Representatives from governments and non-governmental organisations
agreed to adopt as a common goal the elimination of all anti-personnel
landmines in Africa and the establishment of Africa as an anti-personnel
landmine free zone.
Senegal, Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, Botswana and South Africa signed the
Brussels declaration, participated in the Oslo treaty negotiations and
were in Ottawa in December to sign the Landmines Convention.
Furthermore, Ghana's military forces do not use or have any stockpiles
of anti-personnel landmines. Uganda, a former producer of two types on
anti-personnel landmines has successfully converted its production infrastructure
into a dry cell battery production line. South Africa, a former producer
has destroyed over 300 000 of its anti-personnel landmine stockpiles in
under six months and prior to its signing of the Convention.
U.S. mines are killing and maiming the people of Africa.
How many more African women, children and men will have their lives
destroyed by landmines? How many more hospital beds filled? Prostheses
made? How much more agricultural land rendered unusable? How many more
roads destroyed? How many more veterans, development, humanitarian, women's,
medical, children and religious groups will need to write to you? How many
more petitions must be signed and delivered to you before you sign and
ratify the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production
and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction ?
The United States has manufactured anti-personnel landmines which have
left Africa the most severely affected continent in the world. U.S. mines
can be found in farmers' fields from the Horn to Southern Africa and as
far across the continent as the Bedouin routes of Western Sahara. U.S.
manufactured anti-personnel landmines have been found in Ethiopia, Somalia,
Morocco, Tunisia, Angola, Malawi, Western Sahara and Zambia. For years,
the U.S. supplied mines covertly to rebel groups in Angola and Mozambique,
two of the most mined countries in Africa. The U.S. provided mines to UNITA
rebels in Angola until 1991. In addition many areas are strewn with unexploded
U.S.-manufactured air-delivered anti-personnel and anti-tank sub-munitions.
President Clinton was the first world leader to call for the elimination
of anti-personnel landmines in September 1994 at the United Nations. Since
then American policy has not mirrored his call. Current U.S. policy dictates
that by the year 2003, anti-personnel landmines will not be used outside
Korea and by 2006 anti-personnel landmines will no longer be used on the
Korean peninsula. This policy, however does exempt the use of mixed-mined
systems - containing both anti-personnel landmines and anti-tank mines.
This policy ensures that the U.S. will stay on the outside of the global
effort to ban this weapon, which threatens the security of many communities
throughout the entire African continent. The U.S. will continue to pursue
negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament, where they will fall into
a slow incremental process that fails to address a comprehensive solution
to the problem. There is an international norm already out there regarding
the landmine crisis and it is the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines and on
their Destruction.
Most recently, there have been attempts by the U.S. to bypass the treaty
by increasing its efforts to dissuade NATO countries, which have signed
the treaty to ratify it. The Clinton administration is pursuing this so
that can retain its own stockpiles on their soil. These actions highlight
the continued breach between U.S. rhetoric and policy. Of the U.S.$94.5
million projected for U.S. mine-related initiatives worldwide for the fiscal
year 1998 less than 13% will be expended on mine action programmes which
are integrated into a development response. Less than 1% is allocated for
mine victim assistance. In contrast over 65% will be expended through Department
of Defence programmes - the present U.S. policy is that funds will only
be allocated to United Nations demining programmes when a direct U.S. Military
Training Mission 'is not appropriate'.
U.S.$21 million, over one-third of the Department of Defence budget,
will be expended on research conducted by military-linked institutions
which, to date, have concentrated on technologies with little potential
utility for widescale demining in developing countries. U.S.$16 million
of the Department of Defence funding, more than the total budget allocated
for development-based demining, is earmarked for 'other support' . The
Department of Defence's demining programmes are based on dispatching Special
Forces training teams to equip and conduct initial training of military
personnel in the host country. For instance, in Eritrea since 1994 only
120 deminers have been trained (30 of these only in recent months) at a
cost of over U.S.$6 million. No detailed clearance information is available
and no widescale community awareness initiative has been undertaken to
minimise the impact of landmines in Eritrea. There is no victim assistance
component within the U.S. programme although funding has been allocated
to facilitate the transportation of 60 trucks for demining support - one
truck per two deminers. The scale of the programme is totally inadequate
for a national demining programme and few people in the country are aware
of its existence.
Demands
With these facts in mind it is hardly appropriate for President Clinton
and Madeleine Albright to boast of the U.S. doing more about the landmines
problem than other countries - they have a moral responsibility to remedy
the humanitarian disaster to which U.S. mines and U.S. military assistance
programmes have been a major contributor.
In 1994, the U.S. president made a personal commitment to the banning
of landmines when he declared the goal of "ridding the world of those
often hidden weapons to save the lives of tens of thousands of men and
women and innocent children in the years to come". Today, the African
Campaigns to Ban Landmines challenge President Clinton to put his words
into action by recognising that the Ban Treaty, signed in Ottawa in December,
is indeed the best way to achieve what he pledged. Therefore, the African
Campaigns to Ban Landmines and the undersigned non-governmental organisations
call on President Clinton, to take the opportunity on this visit, the first
by an incumbent U.S. president in 20 years, to undertake the following
actions immediately:
- Sign and Ratify the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling,
Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines and on their Destruction.
- Make a commitment, effective immediately, never to use or to be party
to the use, by governments or opposition groups, of anti-personnel mines
in Africa.
- Cease its badgering of NATO countries to allow U.S. anti-personnel
mines on their territory.
Finally with regards to the U.S. governments funding and participation
in demining and victim assistance, we call for the following immediate
actions:
- To integrate the U.S. demining response into the civilian and developmental
infrastructure of mine-affected countries in Africa and to separate these
initiatives completely from U.S. military assistance programmes. All such
demining initiatives should be properly prioritised based on first and
second phase surveys to assess the social impact of landmines and technical
requirements for clearance.
- To work in close cooperation with the United Nations and the relevant
specialist NGO's in the development of mine action programmes and to ensure
transparency in all aspects of such operations.
- Research and development of relevant new demining techniques are welcomed
but they should not be linked to military research.
- The United States must recognise its moral responsibility as a source
of the landmines which blight the African continent and should release
separate funds for the assistance of mine victims, their families and mine-affected
communities.
This statement is endorsed by: [endorsements to be added here]
The African Campaigns to Ban Landmines are:
South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Kenya, Malawi, Sudan, Somalia
This material is being reposted for wider distribution by the Africa
Policy Information Center (APIC), the educational affiliate of the Washington
Office on Africa. APIC's primary objective is to widen the policy debate
in the United States around African issues and the U.S. role in Africa,
by concentrating on providing accessible policy-relevant information and
analysis usable by a wide range of groups individuals.
|